Moderate Dilemma

There have been many postings already about the 2006 senate races. One issue that is raised in each posting is the fact that two moderate Republicans--Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and Olympia Snowe of Maine--are up for reelection in two years. Many have wondered: should we try to take them down or focus more resources on more conservative Republicans?
Why we should take them down:
They're in blue states so we have a chance of winning. They contribute to the Republican majority in the senate. According to voterpunch.org Olympia Snowe and Lincoln Chafee have a lower progressive score then Ben Nelson. The only Democrat they are above is Zell Miller. The Republicans have had no qualms about taking down moderate Democrats like Tom Daschle. Even though they are popular in their states now, keep in mind Tom Daschle was very popular until John Thune started campaigning against him. Tom Daschle was reelected in 1998 with 70% of the vote.

The only problem with trying to take them down is if we fail--and there is a chance we could fail--then they will be more loyal to the Republican party than ever and we might lose any chance of them switching parties. Tell me what you think.


Poll
Should we try to take down the moderate Republicans?
Yes
No

Votes: 13
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


not sure.... (none / 0)

The moderate pro-choice republicans really help us on certain issues.  Not to mention where they are from: Penn, Maine, Rhode Island, etc.  Those states are fairly blue.  It's hard to say right now.  Will they switch parties soon?

Vermont is a tough one since Jeffords sides with us.

In 2008, let's oust Mitch McConnell and bring everyone to KY to campaign against him!

The Kentucky Democrat
by kydem on Mon Dec 27, 2004 at 09:30:41 PM EST

NO (none / 0)

No, I don't think so. First, the term 'take down' is really wrong. I think a more appropriate word is 'defeat' - The most important Republicans to defeat are the ones who divide the House and Senate and prevent meaningful dialogue, and compromise on the issues. The bottom line is that our legislators are elected to serve the country. We can't let a few bad apples like Tom Delay and Bill Frist create gridlock by forcing their extremist politics and rabid-viewpoint judges down everyones throat and then try to blame it on us, the Dems, when we all, collectively gag.

Common sense tells me that moderate GOPers are the only ones who are smart enough to be Americans first, GOP partisans second..

Lets give them a break and try hardest to defeat the ones who got us into this mess. Quickly.

by ultraworld on Tue Dec 28, 2004 at 01:41:33 AM EST

The answer would be yes (none / 0)

we should if we can take them out because this is about legislative power which comes down to whether or not you control the legislature(or have the votes to change committee power etc), and not whether the other side may or may not support some of our issues. The later idea is a license to failure because it depends on the "good will" of the other team- in sports this would be like the Red Sox expecting the Yankees to let the Red Sox win because they "like" the Red Sox. I will not get into how they sell us out when they are actually in office.  However, from several diaries (because I don't know these particular candidates state political landscapes for senators) I have read, I am assuming the particular choices here are not in danger. We should still try to field strong challenges to them, but understand likelihoods.
by bruh21 on Tue Dec 28, 2004 at 09:20:27 AM EST

Re: The answer would be yes (none / 0)

Take em down. Ideological nuances don't count. Votes are the only measure of legislative opposition, and last time I checked they were Republicans. That puts them in Frist's corner no matter how you slice the ideological balony.
by Gary Boatwright on Tue Dec 28, 2004 at 11:26:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.